This is Diane Benscoter’s all-too-short video on her membership of, and escape from, the Moonie cult;
For me the importance of all negative behaviours lies in how far they can help us in deciding how to live positively. For example the value of criminology lies in what insights it can give us for schooling, parenting, community welfare, governance etc.
My question here is how do cults and fundamentalism relate to each other?
Sub-questions – What characteristics do cults and fundamentalist groups hold in common? Is there any religion that protects the autonomy and freedom of the individual? (Quakerism?) Can a religion not be a cult, but be run as a cult by being captured by ‘fundamentalists’? Is not the difference between fundamentalism and simple being strait-laced what you want to happen to others?
My immediate thoughts are;
Cults and Fundamentalism share the desire to;
a) have power over others and remove their freedom – up to the point of removing identity,
b) extract or utilise the energy and resources from the individual
To do this they need to
maintain in ‘believers’ an imposed ‘reading’ of the world
prevent deviation from this via the threat of dire consequences
establish and keep up ‘them and us’ consciousness
Which other questions and characteristics should I have included?
PS Diane Benscoter’s theory of cults being a ‘viral meme-etic infection’ is useful
I think cults and fundamentalism are about insulated belief systems. What’s so scary about them is that they are such complete-systems, closed ecologies. I think it’s not normally useful to use labels like this.
I’ve been advised in Christian churches not to read Nietzsche for example, because such a reading could pull me away from the true path of righteousness (or some other such reason). It’s all a manner of degree.
LikeLike