“How was your day dear.” – the place of story and narrative in our lives

800px-Blind_monks_examining_an_elephant

“A number of blind men came to an elephant. Somebody told them that it was an elephant. The blind men asked, ‘What is the elephant like?’ and they began to touch its body. One of them said: ‘It is like a pillar.’ This blind man had only touched its leg. Another man said, ‘The elephant is like a husking basket.’ This person had only touched its ears. Similarly, he who touched its trunk or its belly talked of it differently. In the same way, he who has seen the Lord in a particular way limits the Lord to that alone and thinks that He is nothing else.”

This story is told in many cultures all over the world – see other versions HERE

INTRODUCTION:

It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of story/narrative, both in life generally and in my SunWALK model in particular.  We are a set of stories.  We live in sets of community-stories.  We mature according to the stories to which we subscribe.  Planning is just a projected narrative.  The past we choose to have is a story adjusted.

In the SunWALK (human-centred studies) model stories are

the glue that makes of the parts a whole

the means for structuring experience in communities

bridges for the flow of culture

the primary act of mind

sources of healing and mystical at-one-ment and connective flow

sources of imagination and creativity

the means by which we come to understand who we are and what we represent

where the three forms of truth-telling can come together – the poetic, the objective and the moral

the means for constructing education cetred on being human, in the world with others

the means for creative the curriculum framework

STORY and NARRATIVE:

Stories Lives Tell; Narrative and Dialogue in Education
is a study of the centrality of narrative in the work that teachers and other educators do. The three themes of the book are central to the SunWALK model. They are: that story and narrative are primary tools in the educator’s work; that education requires one to take seriously the quest for life’s meaning and the care for persons; and that narrative and dialogue can serve as teaching and learning models that transcend the boundaries of disciplines, professions, and cultures.
Witherell, Carol and Noddings, Nel, (Eds.) (1991) Stories Lives Tell; Narrative and Dialogue in Education, NY: Teachers College Press

MYTHS:

“…man is in his actions and practice, as well as in his fictions, essentially a story-telling animal” MacIntyre takes the view that we/humanity are in the midst of a story & that is through the story/ies that we understand each other and ourselves. MacIntyre p 201

Storytelling according to Chinua Achebe, the Ibo novelist is “the basis of our existence – who we are, what we think we are, what people say we are, what other people think we are.” John Windsor The Inde 20.8.94

Myth is where the Muse lives – it is from here we get our creativity. We need to experience life as a poem.

Through mythology we are not seeking truth we are seeking an experience of being alive in a great wholeness. Aunt Jane.

All stories consist of – Exposition:Conflict:Resolution

Narrative has been described as a primary act of mind; children construct their world through story…. This process should be an active experience, involving questioning, problem solving, hypothesising and imagining.’ Cox Report English 5-11, Nov. 1988

FIRST SITUATION Man in the World and with The World, Nature and Culture – Freire

“Through the discussion of this situation – man as a being of relationships – the participants arrive at the distinction between two worlds: that of nature and that of culture. They perceive the normal situation of man as a being in the world and with the world, as a creative and re-creative being who, through work, constantly alters reality.” – Paulo Friere, p.63, Education: The Practice of Freedom

FROM ‘HARD TIMES’ a novel by Charles Dickens

This tells everything about holism, and the three voices of being human – the Creative ‘I’ voice, the Critical ‘I’ voice and the Caring-moral ‘WE’ voice;

“Its father as calls me Sissy , sir,” returned the young girl in a trembling voice, and with another curtsey.

“Then he has no business to do it,” said Mr Gradgrind. “Tell him he mustn’t. Cecilia Jupe. Let me see. What is your father?”

“He belongs to the horse-riding, if you please sir.” Mr Gradgrind frowned, and waved off the objectionable calling with his hand.

“We don’t want to know about that , here. You mustn’t tell us about that, here. Very well, then. Describe your father as a horsebreaker. He doctors sick horses, I dare say?”

“Oh yes, sir.”

“Very well then. He is a veterinary surgeon, a farrier and horse-breaker. Give me your definition of a horse.”

(Sissy Jupe thrown into the greatest alarm by this demand.)

“Girl number twenty unable to define a horse!” said Mr Gradgrind, for the general behoof of all the little pitchers. Girl number twenty possessed of no facts, in reference to one of the commonest of animals! Some boy’s definition of a horse. Bitzer yours.”…………………..

Bitzer,” said Thomas Gradgrind. “Your definition of a horse.”

“Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-five grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.” thus (and much more) Bitzer.

“Now girl number twenty, said Mr Gradgrind. “You know what a horse is.”

SOME ADDITIONAL SOURCES

http://www.stevedenning.com/What_story.html

Ver: 8th July 2009

Questions-Creating-Phil-Cam

 

James Nottingham presents the above useful diagram and a commentary on his blog;

He says;

The Question Quadrant is a powerful tool developed by Phil Cam to elicit and generate questions that can be used to conduct a philosophy lesson. The purpose is to initiate and model the types of questions that can be used to produce in-depth discussion with communities just starting P4C. The Quadrant can be used to distinguish closed and open questions that relate specifically to the text; or closed and open questions that stimulate intellectual curiosity.
The Question Quadrant can be used in small groups or as a whole class. Trent Burns at Cambewarra Primary School in New South Wales, Australia has been using the approach to role model the types of questions that P4C seeks, placing the Question Quadrant in the middle of an inquiry circle.
The questions show in the diagram were taken from the picture book More Spaghetti I Say by Rita Golden-Gelman.
The Question Quadrant is a powerful tool developed by Phil Cam to elicit and generate questions that can be used to conduct a philosophy lesson. The purpose is to initiate and model the types of questions that can be used to produce in-depth discussion with communities just starting P4C. The Quadrant can be used to distinguish closed and open questions that relate specifically to the text; or closed and open questions that stimulate intellectual curiosity.

The Question Quadrant can be used in small groups or as a whole class. Trent Burns at Cambewarra Primary School in New South Wales, Australia has been using the approach to role model the types of questions that P4C seeks, placing the Question Quadrant in the middle of an inquiry circle.

The questions show in the diagram were taken from the picture book More Spaghetti I Say by Rita Golden-Gelman.

 

 

To go to James’ blog click  HERE

Education is a mess – is there an integrative way to teach?

I have updated an introduction to the SunWALK model of human-centred studies; 

SunWALK: Summary of the main meanings of the components represented in 
the model and its ‘logo-diagram-mandala’ – providing a teacher’s process model 

 

sunwalk-logo

.

SunWALK: Summary of the main meanings of the components represented in 

the model and its ‘logo-diagram-mandala’ – providing a teacher’s process model

Give me a brief introduction:

SunWALK grew out of reflection on many years of teaching children and adults and particularly a period of five years teaching in a RC middle school – theorizing my practice via a PhD and practising my theory day-to-day.

SunWALK simply says that the quality of all of our lives will be higher if we undertake all education within the framework of deepening our humanity.  

Deepening our humanity is a matter of developing technical competencies within the chief dimensions of the human spirit; Caring (the Humanities), Creativity (the Arts) and Criticality (the Sciences & Philosophy) – all in local, national and world Communities.  These are the ‘4Cs’ of the model – 3 intra-personal, 1 inter-personal.

We and our one planet will be better of if all of the technical stuff, from learning to read to Masters degrees in engineering, take place in the context of humanization/the 4Cs.  This requires international, national, school & classroom commitment to deepening the best of being human as the context for learning the technical.

We can’t afford to have character and morality and compassion as hoped-for accidental outcomes.  Moral Education, PSME, RE etc. don’t work as bolt-on extras.  They need to be the general context in which competencies are developed.

It is a model based on the energy flow of the human spirit – that is the given. That is physical, mental and spiritual energy that flows through all living human beings.  

That energy, the human spirit, is the true ’stuff of education’.  With the best of the past teachers need to equip children to face tomorrow’s challenges which will always be a mixture of new problems combined with eternally recurrent problems.  Building all education with will be the medium with which the teacher works to nurture and challenge balanced development.

Today we have lost the balance between specialization, and whole-systems thinking and acting – SunWALK model brings into harmony the best of ‘Western’ & ‘Eastern’ world-views. 

OK – so what’s the ‘Sun’ and the ‘WALK in the model’?

The ‘Sun’ = the individual’s spiritual inspiration & values sources – accumulated and ongoing, as operating internally and as expressed in speech and behaviour. 

WALK = Willing & Wise Action through Loving & Knowing – here seen as the general goal for education, and as the interiority, character and behaviour of the student. 

The model/logo combines a range of sub-models including the following:

a) An ‘interior’ model of the human spirit – in relation to ‘the world’.

b) A model for re-positioning education within being & becoming human – in the world with others.

c) A general model of the curriculum – for primary, secondary and higher education.

d) A framework for the analysis and evaluation of teaching episodes or projects.

e) A model of education that makes non-faith-specific spiritual and moral education intrinsic to all learning.

 

THE MODEL AND THE PROCESS IN ONE (long) SENTENCE: – 

The SunWALK model of spiritualizing pedagogy sees human education as the 

storied

development of 

meaning, which is 

constructed, and de-constructed, 

physically, mentally and spiritually, through 

Wise & Willing

Action, via 

Loving and Knowing – developed in 

Community, through the

‘Dialectical Spiritualization [1]’of 

Caring, Creativity & Criticality processes, all undertaken in the light of the 

‘Sun’ of chosen higher-order

values and beliefs, using best available,appropriate 

content.

These underlined concerns are central components and focuses of the practice and theory in the model. 

This is an intense combination of theory and practice.  It automatically requires the teacher to practice their theory and theorise their practice – dynamically as practice-based research.  It automatically enables the classroom to be connected to the school & community as a whole and to e.g. a relevant department in a university.

It attempts to suffuse all teaching with the demands, challenges and joy of being human in the world with others.  But it seeks to bring together the Whole and the parts, the ineffable and the concepts – not just concepts because as Heschel (1971:7) says, “Concepts are delicious snacks with which we try to alleviate our amazement.”

The diagram/logo/

The outer ring of the SunWALK logo combines two dimensions:

1 ‘Community i.e. the social,interpersonal dimension of interaction with other individuals or groups.

2  ‘Cultural sources’ including such dimensions as the traditions, the political & the legal.  

The three major divisions of the arts,sciences and humanities are here thought of as the stored, yet potentially dynamic, accumulation of knowledge and beliefs and procedures – everything from galleries to written laws of physics that the individual can draw upon or be influenced by. This is the ‘stuff out there’ rather than the interiority of consciousness in which there is the perpetual flow and re-shaping, focusing de-focusing etc. of heart-mind.

In SunWALK everything within the inner circle = a representation of ‘interiority’, i.e. human consciousness – the human spirit. 

The human spirit is presented intra-personally as 3 ‘voices’ – 3 modes of being & of engaging with reality & of knowing.

The three emanate from the singleness of ‘heart-mind’, consciousness.  

They are presented (metaphorically) as the ‘primary colours’ of Creativity (the yellow of inspiration), Criticality (the blue of reason) & Caring (the red warmth of love). 

Creativity is the ‘I’ voice of subjective engagement via an artistic medium – it is concerned with subjective knowing and is particularly related to the core virtue ‘beauty’ and its products are of course ‘the Arts’. 

Criticality is the ‘IT’ voice of objective engagement which enables progress in the Sciences ( & Maths., Philosophy and ‘critical’ studies). It is concerned with objective knowing – and it is related particularly to the core virtue ‘truth’.  The products of course are the sciences and technology  – but also philosophy and critical studies.

Caring is the ‘WE’ voice which enables moral engagement – for progress in the moral domain and in service of others. It is concerned with social knowing – related particularly to the core virtue ‘goodness’ and to ‘the Humanities’. 

All three of course need to be conditioned by the pre-eminent virtue of justice.  All students need to have these ways of engaging with reality developed in a balanced way.  High technical competence combined with moral dwarfism leads to ……

The physical dimension is seen as the instrument for the flow of spirit in all of its forms – e.g. via dance, drama & PE and sports.

Each individual develops her/his I, WE and IT voices, the 3Cs, via socialization, starting in the family, the local community and then later in formal education. A sense of justice is seen as paramount intrapersonally as well as inter-personally i.e. it enables us to engage with that which is beautiful, good or true with balance, clarity & due weight.

The essential process in all 4Cs is multi-level dialogue. In the case of the individual dialogue is seen as meditation, reflection and inner-talk. In the case of groups it is dialectical process via consultation.

The ‘Celtic’ knot that surrounds the central shield indicates that the 3Cs are simply aspects of the one human spirit– the flow of ‘heart-mind’.

The white shield at the centre represents the meditative state in which there is no ‘focused’ engagement via one of the 3Cs – and in which there is relatively little of the interference or chatter that we experience in the unquiet mind. 

This can enable us to ‘go beyond ourselves’, i.e. transcend our normal knowing – any of the 3Cs (I, WE or IT modes), as gateways, can be a pathway to the transcendent and to subsequent improved insight into reality.

The black dot at the centre is the ‘well-spring’ of consciousness. For artists (and great scientists) it is the Muse. For religionists it is the voice of God within (albeit distorted by the dust of self). For non-religionists it is the inner source of spirit as energy & inspiration – the bits of realization and insight that come to us for which we don’t make an effort.

Educating the human spirit is seen as nurturing, and cultivating, the life-force which culminates in the developed human who, through higher-order consciousness, realizes abilities from within Caring, Creative or Critical engagements. 

Teaching is seen as nurturing and cultivating what is normally present, almost from birth, & certainly by the time we go to school – namely the flow of spirit expressed in nascent forms of Caring, Creativity, and Criticality – in Community with others. Holistic Learning takes place when the learner uses Creativity, Criticality and Caring – in Community – inspired by higher-order values – in dynamic combinations such as Creativity providing texts for criticality – which then, via dialogue, produce/attract the spirit for more creativity.

In SunWALK spirituality is not a dimension; it is the model as a whole. In SunWALK moral education is not a dimension – it is intrinsic to all of its praxis. 

The SunWALK logo can also be seen as a mandala, or even as a plan drawing for a fountain or an ‘arts centre of light’!  

SunWALK is a major shift to a process view of the world, of being human and of educating our young people. It rejects a worldview that is limited to the mechanistic, the ‘human-as-computer, the fragmentary and the materialistic; seeking instead modelling that is based on flow/process, holism and the spiritual.   

SunWALK is designed to enable teachers and students to become agents of change to transform a world that is still operated as atomistic, mechanistic and materialistic into one that is holistic, dialogic, and derived from the best processes and products of the human spirit.

The SunWALK logo and model of education Copyright Roger Prentice 1995 & 2009

.

 

—–0—–

SEE ALSO these allied blogs –

 Human-centred courses –

 Dictionary of Concepts

Home is HERE i.e. my ‘meta-blog’ -The ´1000 ways …of Celebrating the human spirit

 

—–0—–

 

Do you remember when all the world was a giant ice-cream?

This wonderful, simple, perfect, timeless photograph by Benn Mitchell is on the Boca Raton Museum of Art. 

bennmitchellgirleatingicecream

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The museums blurb says this; 

Color Me New York – Photographs by Benn Mitchell
Through January 18, 2009

The exhibition honors Benn Mitchell as a forerunner in realistic photography, documenting life in New York City during the 1930s through the 1950s. Mitchell (born in New York City 1926 – ) sold his first photograph to LIFE magazine at the age of 16. Just one year later he became a portrait photographer in Hollywood for Warner Brothers’ studios, capturing classic images of Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall, among others. In 1948, Mitchell started his own commercial studio in New York City, the beginning of a career lasting over five decades. This exhibition presents 16 color images shot in the streets of New York City between 1947 and 1980, which capture Benn Mitchell’s acute observations, and his award-winning eye for both the artistic and the incidental. Mitchell now lives with his wife Esther in Boca Raton
.

 

To go to the museum’s site click HERE

Click HERE to have your say about this…

Click HERE to have your say about this article –  at SEESMIC  video discussion

We enjoyed immensly our visit to Unveiled: New art from the middle-east at London’s Saatchi Gallery.  This ‘review’ is about Ghost by Kader Attia – and how it is great work – including for teachers or home-schoolers.  (Exhibition ends 9th May 2009)

 

kader_attia_ghosts_2

Kader Attia – Ghost – 2007 – Aluminium foil – Dimensions variable – Saatchi Gallery, London

In Ghost, a large installation of a group of Muslim women in prayer, Attia renders their bodies as vacant shells, empty hoods devoid of personhood or spirit. Made from tin foil – a domestic, throw away material – Attia’s figures become alien and futuristic, synthesising the abject and divine. Bowing in shimmering meditation, their ritual is equally seductive and hollow, questioning modern ideologies – from religion to nationalism and consumerism – in relation to individual identity, social perception, devotion and exclusion. Attia’s Ghost evokes contemplation of the human condition as vulnerable and mortal; his impoverished materials suggest alternative histories or understandings of the world, manifest in individual and temporal experience. (This is the gallery description)

-0-

Draft Notes for suggested lessons:

I always admire simplicity – creating a profound piece just by wrapping aluminium foil around a room full of kneeling women – great simplicity.

Presence and absence – traces – how and it what ways do people live on.

Why might the artist have called the piece Ghost as opposed to Ghosts?  Which do you prefer and why?

What makes a person a person?

Which bits of the gallery description of Ghost make good sense to you  – and which don’t – and why?

Two of the most important concerns in a person’s development are 1) identity – who am I? and 2) purpose – what am I dedicating my life to?  What has Ghost to do with identity and purpose?

How powerful might it be if, as a performance piece, a real live woman came and filled one of the places?  Would you dress her in aluminium or not – how else would you dress her?  Would she speak to the audience?  What would she say?

The aluminium creates boundaries, forms – of people who were/are/aren’t no more.  Is there spirit to go with the form – or not?  If so what is it – where is it – whose spirit is it?

What are your feelings about the women whose forms gave rise to the ghost/s?

How might a fundamentalist respond to this piece?  How might a modern believer respond to this piece?  

Create a conversation betwen two such people.  

What would the whole thing be like if the women had been from Christian/Jewish/Hindu/Buddhist etc background?

What conclusions do you come to as a result of viewing the photograph  – or better still having visited the exhibition?

How would you use your/the above ideas to make your own art?

Palestininan woman and Israeli soldier – photograph by Noel Jabbour

I loved the teasing ambiguity of this photograph at Boca Raton Museum Of Art – dare we hope that something good might, just might, be passing between them – some kindness instead of cruelty, some recognition instead of hatred?  Is the hand about to become a fist?  Is she touching his chest in an appeal such as she might make to her son? Does the ambiguity shift the photograph from documentary to fine art?  Does the space created by the ambiguity make the art? 

paelestinian-woman-israeli-soldier-noel-jabbour

 

—–0—–

 Have you seen the SunWALK human-centred studies model? – summary HERE 

A slide version of the SunWALK holistic education model – on what it is to be fully and positively human

A slide version of the SunWALK holistic education model – on  what it is to be fully and positively human:

 

HERE

 

.

Free – thousands of online books and audiobooks

listening-recording-deviceSOURCE – see here for a wonderful site on texting and SMS

1) Whilst looking for an e-copy of Dickens Hard Times I came across this amazing site that provides MP3, downloadable versions of classic books and much else – free audio-books – Librivox.

The Librivox catalogue starts HERE

2) The Librivox material was on an even more astonishing site the Internet Archive

The Internet Achive is about;

The Internet Archive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit that was founded to build an Internet library, with the purpose of offering permanent access for researchers, historians, and scholars to historical collections that exist in digital format. Founded in 1996 and located in the Presidio of San Francisco, the Archive has been receiving data donations from Alexa Internet and others. In late 1999, the organization started to grow to include more well-rounded collections. Now the Internet Archive includes textsaudiomoving images, and software as well asarchived web pages in our collections. 

3) What an amazing age in which we live – at least in terms of learning and communication – SAVE THE INTERNET

Re Gaza: “Certitude divides and diversity unifies…..We have to elevate religion above politics…..” Amen.

 

“Certitude divides and diversity unifies…..We have to elevate religion above politics…..”
“Certitude divides and diversity unifies…..We have to elevate religion above politics…..” H.R.H. Prince El-Hassan Bin Talal of Jordan BBC Newsnight 9th Feb 2006. Photo source: BBC

 Juxtapositioning creates new contexts.  Words and images are one such juxtapositioning.

I have suggested that the Finnish artist photographer Silomaki has shown new ways.

The images of the suffering of the people Gaza are currently relentless, none worse than those of parents carrying dead or  injured children.

These words came to mind – those of H.R.H. Prince El-Hassan Bin Talal of Jordan on BBC Newsnight, 9th Feb 2006, “Certitude divides and diversity unifies…..We have to elevate religion above politics…..”

The image is one of a multitude. The words are rare wisdom.

When the rockets and shells fire no more how shall we live that wisdom?  

Lead us Oh God to the ways and means!

Reading Barthes – some points about the point or punctum of photography

richtersfmomareading1
Lesende (Reader), 1994 Oil on linen Collection SFMOMA, purchased through the gifts of Mimi and Peter Haas and Helen and Charles Schwab, and the Accessions Committee Fund © Gerhard Richter.

The famous book Camera Lucida by Roland Barthes, about the nature of experiencing a photograph, refers to  his depth of feeling about a photograph we never see, a photograph of his mother.  This picture Lesende (Reader) affects me considerably, but not as much as one of my mother as a young woman leaning on her bicycle.  It affects me for reasons I can bring to mind, but also affects me beyond such reasoning.  (At first I thought it was a photograph – it is an oil painting in just one of Richter’s extraordinary range of styles.)  We are much more than what we think, we are, in addition to that which is known, a mystery – even to ourselves.

The depth of affect (feeling) is determined by the subject, that is by the unique admixture of experiences and personal history each of us has had.  But of course most have experiences in common; pleasure, pain, loss etc.  The personal history is what determines the exact nature of the punctum, the ‘pain’ we feel when we are grabbed, held and moved by an art object.

Photographs then , or more accurately the experience of them,  are created, like other forms of communication, from what the viewer brings added to what the artist provides.  That is we ‘read’ a work of art with a combination of what is there, objectively, and what we subjectively bring.

It makes sense to refer to a) the affective resonance as compared to b) the cultural provision by the particular art work.  Or the punctum and studium as per Barthes.

‘Resonates’ seems apt because it is a kind of shaking or spasm or feinting – depending on the surprise and depth of the aesthetic experience.  We say, “It resonates with me, or “It didn’t resonate with me.”  When there is a perfect alignment between the elements of the art object and our subjective self we are ‘swept away’, ‘riveted’, ‘the earth moves’, ‘we cease to exist’ (at least as a reasoning objectifying entity), we are stunned, speechless etc.

Of course the artist/photographer had his/her own co-equivalent to the punctum – the germ and urge to en-form some movement of spirit.

In narrative terms the above picture by Gerhard Richter sets up a host of possibilities – is she reading exam results, a newspaper story, a letter from a friend…… But that is not what takes us in the first place nor we return from the unitive experience of our first encounter is it such possibilities that are the really interesting philosophical  payoffs.

For me it is that we are reading, just as she is reading, and it is the intensity of the focus in her reading – the set of her mouth and jaw that creates the power of the piece.

We are also on the edge of intrusion, in the tension of personaal and social space.  That’s the punctum for me, that’s where the resonances are.   Where are they for you?

SOURCES

Barthes’s Punctum – Michael Fried

What Do We Want Photography to Be? A Response to Michael Fried – James Elkins

LESSON POSSIBILITIES

You need to know more about what Candida Lucida says – start with WikiPedia article.

1 Find different reproductions of the painting – what difference does it make?

2 How would you name and explain punctum and studium in a more accessible language?

3 Have a look at Richter’s other work – an extraordinary range of styles.

4 Do philosophical inquiry lessons (PFC) on the major concerns of the article.

5 Make your own pictures of the Reader picture.

What are your own ideas for yourself or your class.

SOME QUESTIONS

What is a Camera Lucida and why might it have been a metaphor for Barthes

How and in what way is each mind, or soul, a Camera Lucida?

Is the use of a camera Lucida cheating?   (See the whole debate started by the painter David Hockney)

What are your own questions for yourself or your class?

—–0—–

 

Reading Barthes

Street art celebrated

The Wooster Collective’s celebration of street art is HERE

One I particularly liked is;

 

someones-supermarket

I always find simplicity and re-contextualization powerful – you can’t get much simpler re-contextualization than ‘Someone’s Supermarket’!

Of course it depends on the eye to see and the heart to feel – and the wit to chuckle!

Woman photographers 1: Cindy Sherman

This is for general enjoyment or as a set of  suggestions for lessons for use in schools, colleges and universities.

Developed and extended from an earlier posting.    Update posted 19th Dec 2008.

—–0—–

Starting points for appreciating the artist Cindy Sherman

The woman behind the many constructions of us.
The woman behind the many constructions of us.

 

 

 

One of countless constructions - but she is us not her.
One of countless constructions - but she is us, not her. Whose head is being held?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is she more or less nude than if she were nude?  Why leave the body-mask so evident?
Is she more or less nude than if she were really nude? Why leave the body-mask so evident?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General questions about the photographer Cindy Sheman for reflection or discussion

What other concerns do you see in her work other than re-presentation of the male gaze?

Is she a feminist – or a humanist – or something else?  Does she go beyond what feminists have said abou the ‘male gaze’?  Is she anti-man?  Does she have a ‘political agenda’ or is she working with ‘nuances of cultural meaning pinned irrevocably between shifts back and forth between the objective and subjective’?

Why hasn’t she, or someone else, done for men what she has done for women, and for humanity via women?

As you gather critical comments about her how satisfied are you with what people write about her?

Is she a campaigner?  

How far and in what ways do artists change things?

Sherman embodies our flickering memories.” – how far do you agree with this?

Things to do

1 Collect photographs by her.

2 Collect statements by her

3 Collect critcal statements and appreciations about her.

4 Who can you find that is like her, or influenced by her.

5 Create photographs inspired by her

6 What do you learn from quotations (allegedly) by her;

I like making images that from a distance seem kind of seductive, colorful, luscious and engaging, and then you realize what you’re looking at is something totally opposite. It seems boring to me to pursue the typical idea of beauty, because that is the easiest and the most obvious way to see the world. It’s more challenging to look at the other side.”

 

I can’t work without it. And it has to be the right kind, because if it’s not then I get into a bad mood. I work with a remote so that I can change CDs instantly if I need to. (Sherman talking about her need to have music on while working) 

I didn’t want to make “high” art, I had no interest in using paint, I wanted to find something that anyone could relate to without knowing about contemporary art. I wasn’t thinking in terms of precious prints or archival quality; I didn’t want the work to seem like a commodity.

I was supporting myself, but nothing like the guy painters, as I refer to them. I always resented that actually.. we were all getting the same amount of press, but they were going gangbusters with sales.

When I do work, I get so much done in such a concentrated time that once I’m through a series, I’m so drained I don’t want to get near the camera.

I was feeling guilty in the beginning; it was frustrating to be successful when a lot of my friends weren’t. Also, I was constantly being reminded of that by people in my family making jokes. 

 If I knew what the picture was going to be like I wouldn’t make it. It was almost like it was made already.. the challenge is more about trying to make what you can’t think of.

The work is what it is and hopefully it’s seen as feminist work, or feminist-advised work, but I’m not going to go around espousing theoretical bullshit about feminist stuff.

artquotes.net

.

“The still must tease with the promise of a story the viewer of it itches to be told.”

 “I didn’t have any interest in traditional art.”

“I am fine, though it is hard to think of what kind of work to make at this point, other than decorative, escapist or abstract. I suppose I’ll explore one or all of these things.”     

thinkexist.com

 

MY PERSONAL APRECIATION OF CINDY SHERMAN

For me  there are few photographers that we can unhesitatingly say are great photographers, great artists.  Cindy Sherman is one.  

At the simplest level we can say she has made a career out of dressing up and taking photographs of herself.

Ah but its much, much more than that………  Every detail counts, every detail is there because she has consciously constructed it as part of a whole essay of  ‘intended’ meaning, and of meaning-making possibilities of us the viewers. Many enjoyable photographs are created by happenstance – happy chance – you could say that another great Henri Cartier-Bresson built a whole career on capturing the ‘happy accident’.  With Sherman there is no accident – she doesn’t ‘hunt and capture’ she constructs.

For me the frisson of excitement and the essence of her work  I describe as  ‘nuances of cultural meaning pinned irrevocably between shifts back and forth between the objective and subjective‘?  These stimulate us (or at least men) into re-considering not beliefs but memories.  And we are made up of memories (except in the highest mystical sense).

Starting with the B&W film stills she sets up echoes in the bed of memories that exist from having seen endless films. They seem to be the real thing but they are embodiments of rich meaning that were not in any film stills from actual films.  

Unequivocally she made photography subjective in the sense that what she constructs is about interiority of being human.  She constructs and we construct – and re-construct through self-examination of what we thought was normal, fixed, innocent, balanced – the movie stills in our personal memories.

They are about depth of personal and cultural menaning – not the surface

Her photographs will have varying sets of meanings depending on the decade when you started watching films and seeing photographs – especially photographs of women. 

Some individual photographs

sherman-cindy-2001.jpg

Again the body-mask is very evident, emphasized by the contrasting face make-up.  Is that deliberate to tell us that this is not her but woman generally?  If not why would a consummate artist do such a thing?

Is this a come-on or an admixture of all the things/roles that women are subjected to?

 


Additional Resources
    

Great collection of Cindy Sherman photographs HERE

A great ‘mega-site’ on women photographers exists HERE

Variety of biographical statements HERE

News stuff HERE

Check out stuff on Amazon.co. uk and Amazon.com

Check out WikiPedia

—–0—–

All postings to this site relate to the central model in the PhD. Summaries are HERE

 

 Update posted 19th Dec 2008

Women artists: Eva Zeisel – and aesthetics as the playful search for beauty

—–0—–

Eva Zeisel – a 100-year  life-time’s design rooted in a ‘nature and human relationships’ aesthetic.

I’m not interested in innovation.” (Eva)

They are so beautiful – like a symbol of eternity!” (Blog commentator)

Zeisel’s Rockland BowlZeisel’s Rockland Bowl

Her TED presentation;

The ceramics designer Eva Zeisel looks back on a 75-year career. What keeps her work as fresh today (her latest line debuted in 2008) as in 1926? Her sense of play and beauty, and her drive for adventure. Listen for stories from a rich, colorful life.

Eva’s  story is indeed as interesting as her work – for more see HERE

There is a documentary about her (2002) HERE

Amazon have several books about Eva, and vases etc designed by her,  HERE

Courtesy of TED

Photo and comments source Metropolismag Mason Currey

—–0—–

Some questions to include in a school, college or university project on 

Women artists: Eva Zeisel – and aesthetics as the playful search for beauty

Is Eva a designer, an artist or both.

She seems to a) have created beauty and b) been commercially successful against great odds AND impervious to the ‘art-mafia’ that run the fine art world.’  Discuss.

Google Robert Hughes and ‘The Mona Lisa Curse’ – what relevance do you see between the Hughes analysis and the achievement of Eva Zeisel?

Should schools, colleges and universities make a greater effort to find people like Eva who seem to connect to that which is eternal, beyond fashions?