Education is a mess – is there an integrative way to teach?

I have updated an introduction to the SunWALK model of human-centred studies;Ā 

SunWALK: Summary of the main meanings of the components represented inĀ 
the model and its ā€˜logo-diagram-mandalaā€™ ā€“ providing a teacherā€™s process modelĀ 

Ā 

sunwalk-logo

.

SunWALK: Summary of the main meanings of the components represented inĀ 

the model and its ā€˜logo-diagram-mandalaā€™ ā€“ providing a teacherā€™s process model

Give me a brief introduction:

SunWALK grew out of reflection on many years of teaching children and adults and particularly a period of five years teaching in a RC middle school ā€“ theorizing my practice via a PhD and practising my theory day-to-day.

SunWALK simply says that the quality of all of our lives will be higher if we undertake all education within the framework of deepening our humanity. Ā 

Deepening our humanity is a matter of developing technical competencies within the chief dimensions of the human spirit;Ā Caring (the Humanities), CreativityĀ (the Arts) andĀ CriticalityĀ (the Sciences & Philosophy) ā€“ all in local, national and world Communities. Ā These are the ā€˜4Csā€™ of the model ā€“ 3 intra-personal, 1 inter-personal.

We and our one planet will be better of if all of the technical stuff, from learning to read to Masters degrees in engineering, take place in the context of humanization/the 4Cs. Ā This requires international, national, school & classroom commitment to deepening the best of being human as the context for learning the technical.

We canā€™t afford to have character and morality and compassion asĀ hoped-forĀ accidentalĀ outcomes. Ā Moral Education, PSME, RE etc. donā€™t work as bolt-on extras. Ā They need to be the general context in which competencies are developed.

It is a model based on theĀ energy flowĀ of the human spirit ā€“ that is the given. That is physical, mental and spiritual energy that flows through all living human beings. Ā 

That energy, the human spirit, is the true ā€™stuff of educationā€™. Ā With the best of the past teachers need to equip children to face tomorrowā€™s challenges which will always be a mixture of new problems combined with eternally recurrent problems. Ā Building all education with will be the medium with which the teacher works to nurture and challenge balanced development.

Today we have lost the balance between specialization, and whole-systems thinking and acting ā€“ SunWALK model brings into harmony the best of ā€˜Westernā€™ & ā€˜Easternā€™ world-views.Ā 

OK ā€“ so whatā€™s the ā€˜Sunā€™ and the ā€˜WALK in the modelā€™?

The ā€˜Sunā€™ = the individualā€™s spiritual inspiration & values sources ā€“ accumulated and ongoing, as operating internally and as expressed in speech and behaviour.Ā 

WALK = Willing & Wise Action through Loving & Knowing ā€“ here seen as the general goal for education, and as the interiority, character and behaviour of the student.Ā 

The model/logo combines a range of sub-models including the following:

a) An ā€˜interiorā€™ model of the human spirit ā€“ in relation to ā€˜the worldā€™.

b) A model for re-positioning education within being & becoming human ā€“ in the world with others.

c) A general model of the curriculum ā€“ for primary, secondary and higher education.

d) A framework for the analysis and evaluation of teaching episodes or projects.

e) A model of education that makes non-faith-specific spiritual and moral education intrinsic to all learning.

Ā 

THE MODEL AND THE PROCESSĀ IN ONE (long) SENTENCE: –Ā 

The SunWALK model of spiritualizing pedagogy sees human education as theĀ 

storied

developmentĀ ofĀ 

meaning, which isĀ 

constructed, andĀ de-constructed,Ā 

physically,Ā mentallyĀ andĀ spiritually, throughĀ 

WiseĀ &Ā Willing

Action, viaĀ 

LovingĀ andĀ KnowingĀ ā€“ developed inĀ 

Community, through the

ā€˜Dialectical SpiritualizationĀ [1]ā€™ofĀ 

Caring,Ā CreativityĀ &Ā CriticalityĀ processes, all undertaken in the light of theĀ 

ā€˜Sunā€™ of chosen higher-order

valuesĀ andĀ beliefs, using best available,appropriateĀ 

content.

These underlined concerns are central components and focuses of the practice and theory in the model.Ā 

This is an intense combination of theory and practice. Ā It automatically requires the teacher to practice their theory and theorise their practice ā€“ dynamically as practice-based research. Ā It automatically enables the classroom to be connected to the school & community as a whole and to e.g. a relevant department in a university.

It attempts to suffuse all teaching with the demands, challenges and joy of being human in the world with others. Ā But it seeks to bring together the Whole and the parts, the ineffable and the concepts ā€“ not just concepts because as Heschel (1971:7) says, ā€œConcepts are delicious snacks with which we try to alleviate our amazement.ā€

The diagram/logo/

The outer ring of the SunWALK logo combines two dimensions:

1 ā€˜Community i.e. the social,interpersonal dimension of interaction with other individuals or groups.

2Ā  ā€˜Cultural sourcesā€™ including such dimensions as the traditions, the political & the legal. Ā 

The three major divisions of the arts,sciences and humanities are here thought of as the stored, yet potentially dynamic, accumulation of knowledge and beliefs and procedures ā€“ everything from galleries to written laws of physics that the individual can draw upon or be influenced by. This is the ā€˜stuff out thereā€™ rather than the interiority of consciousness in which there is the perpetual flow and re-shaping, focusing de-focusing etc. of heart-mind.

In SunWALK everything within the inner circle = a representation of ā€˜interiorityā€™, i.e. human consciousness ā€“ the human spirit.Ā 

The human spirit is presented intra-personally as 3 ā€˜voicesā€™ ā€“ 3 modes of being & of engaging with reality & of knowing.

The three emanate from the singleness of ā€˜heart-mindā€™, consciousness. Ā 

They are presented (metaphorically) as the ā€˜primary coloursā€™ ofĀ CreativityĀ (the yellow of inspiration),Ā CriticalityĀ (the blue of reason) &Ā CaringĀ (the red warmth of love).Ā 

Creativity is the ā€˜Iā€™ voice of subjective engagement via an artistic medium ā€“ it is concerned with subjective knowing and is particularly related to the core virtue ā€˜beautyā€™ and its products are of course ā€˜the Artsā€™.Ā 

Criticality is the ā€˜ITā€™ voice of objective engagement which enables progress in the Sciences ( & Maths., Philosophy and ā€˜criticalā€™ studies). It is concerned with objective knowing ā€“ and it is related particularly to the core virtue ā€˜truthā€™. Ā The products of course are the sciences and technology Ā – but also philosophy and critical studies.

Caring is the ā€˜WEā€™ voice which enables moral engagement ā€“ for progress in the moral domain and in service of others. It is concerned with social knowing ā€“ related particularly to the core virtue ā€˜goodnessā€™ and to ā€˜the Humanitiesā€™.Ā 

All three of course need to be conditioned by the pre-eminent virtue of justice. Ā All students need to have these ways of engaging with reality developed in a balanced way. Ā High technical competence combined with moral dwarfism leads to ā€¦ā€¦

The physical dimension is seen as the instrument for the flow of spirit in all of its forms ā€“ e.g. via dance, drama & PE and sports.

Each individual develops her/his I, WE and IT voices, the 3Cs, via socialization, starting in the family, the local community and then later in formal education. A sense of justice is seen as paramount intrapersonally as well as inter-personally i.e. it enables us to engage with that which is beautiful, good or true with balance, clarity & due weight.

The essential process in all 4Cs is multi-level dialogue. In the case of the individual dialogue is seen as meditation, reflection and inner-talk. In the case of groups it is dialectical process via consultation.

The ā€˜Celticā€™ knot that surrounds the central shield indicates that the 3Cs are simply aspects of the one human spiritā€“ the flow of ā€˜heart-mindā€™.

The white shield at the centre represents the meditative state in which there is no ā€˜focusedā€™ engagement via one of the 3Cs ā€“ and in which there is relatively little of the interference or chatter that we experience in the unquiet mind.Ā 

This can enable us to ā€˜go beyond ourselvesā€™, i.e. transcend our normal knowing ā€“ any of the 3Cs (I, WE or IT modes), as gateways, can be a pathway to the transcendent and to subsequent improved insight into reality.

The black dot at the centre is the ā€˜well-springā€™ of consciousness. For artists (and great scientists) it is the Muse. For religionists it is the voice of God within (albeit distorted by the dust of self). For non-religionists it is the inner source of spirit as energy & inspiration ā€“ the bits of realization and insight that come to us for which we donā€™t make an effort.

Educating the human spirit is seen as nurturing, and cultivating, the life-force which culminates in the developed human who, through higher-order consciousness, realizes abilities from within Caring, Creative or Critical engagements.Ā 

Teaching is seen as nurturing and cultivating what is normally present, almost from birth, & certainly by the time we go to school ā€“ namely the flow of spirit expressed in nascent forms of Caring, Creativity, and Criticality ā€“ in Community with others. Holistic Learning takes place when the learner uses Creativity, Criticality and Caring ā€“ in Community ā€“ inspired by higher-order values ā€“ in dynamic combinations such as Creativity providing texts for criticality ā€“ which then, via dialogue, produce/attract the spirit for more creativity.

In SunWALK spirituality is not a dimension; it is the model as a whole. In SunWALK moral education is not a dimension ā€“ it is intrinsic to all of its praxis.Ā 

The SunWALK logo can also be seen as a mandala, or even as a plan drawing for a fountain or an ā€˜arts centre of lightā€™! Ā 

SunWALK is a major shift to a process view of the world, of being human and of educating our young people. It rejects a worldview that is limited to the mechanistic, the ā€˜human-as-computer, the fragmentary and the materialistic; seeking instead modelling that is based on flow/process, holism and the spiritual. Ā Ā 

SunWALK is designed to enable teachers and students to become agents of change to transform a world that is still operated as atomistic, mechanistic and materialistic into one that is holistic, dialogic, and derived from the best processes and products of the human spirit.

The SunWALK logo and model of education Copyright Roger Prentice 1995 & 2009

.

Ā 

—–0—–

SEE ALSO these allied blogs –

Ā Human-centred coursesĀ ā€“

Ā Dictionary of Concepts

Home is HERE i.e. my ‘meta-blog’Ā -The Ā“1000 ways ā€¦of Celebrating the human spirit

Ā 

—–0—–

Ā 

What’s the difference between spirituality and religion?

What's the difference between spirituality and religion?
What's the difference between spirituality and religion?

.

How doĀ you answer the question above?

Below is how far I have got with this issue.

Spirituality is how we relate to the unknown and unknowable – to Ultimate reality – and the meaning and motivation we derive therefrom.

Our worldview, as a consequence, is how we ‘read’ the world. Our worldview includes that of which are conscious, plus that which derives from enculturation. Ā Becoming more fully conscious of Oneness, and actingĀ accordingly, is our purpose.

Religion is the agreed set of relationships, teachings and customs held in common with any religious group of which one has membership.

Progress in spirituality is measured by regularly bringing oneself to account – in relation to the standards of your spirituality, world-view and religious group/s (if any).

—–0—–

Etymological issues:

The English word “religion” is derived from the Middle English “religioun” which came from the Old French “religion.” It may have been originally derived from the Latin word “religo” which means “good faith,” “ritual,” andĀ other similar meanings. Or it may have come from the Latin “religĆ£re” which means “to tie fast.”

Doing your own research:

A very good starting point is provided by the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. Ā See HERE

The definitions I like best from this source are;

George Hegel: “the knowledge possessed by the finite mind of its nature as absolute mind.”

Paul Tillich: “Religious is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern”

Others are;

The Religious Tolerance group tell us that David Carpenter has collected and published a list of definitions of religion, including:

Anthony Wallace: “a set of rituals, rationalized by myth, which mobilizes supernatural powers for the purpose of achieving or preventing transformations of state in man or nature.”

Hall, Pilgrim, and Cavanagh: “Religion is the varied, symbolic expression of, and appropriate response to that which people deliberately affirm as being of unrestricted value for them.”

Karl Marx: “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.”

Don Swenson defines religion in terms of the sacred: “Religion is the individual and social experience of the sacred that is manifested in mythologies, ritual, ethos, and integrated into a collective or organization.”

Paul Connelly also defines religion in terms of the sacred and the spiritual: “Religion originates in an attempt to represent and order beliefs, feelings, imaginings and actions that arise in response to direct experience of Ā the sacred and the spiritual. As this attempt expands in its formulation and elaboration, it becomes a process that creates meaning for itself on a sustaining basis, in terms of both its originating experiences and itsĀ own continuing responses.”

He defines sacred as: “The sacred is a mysterious manifestation of power and presence that is experienced as both primordial & transformative, inspiring awe & rapt attention. This is usually an event that represents aĀ break or discontinuity from the ordinary, forcing a re-establishment or recalibration of perspective on the part of the experiencer, but it may also be something seemingly ordinary, repeated exposure to which graduallyĀ produces a perception of mysteriously cumulative significance out of proportion to the significance originally invested in it.”

He further defines the spiritual as: “The spiritual is a perception of the commonality of mindfulness in the world that shifts the boundaries between self and other, producing a sense of the union of purposes of self andĀ other in confronting the existential questions of life, and providing a mediation of the challenge-response interaction between self and other, one and many, that underlies existential questions.”

My final question – “Why are there so many religious intolerance groups?”

To read the full article by the Religious Tolerance group go HERE

ā€”ā€“0ā€”ā€“

True achievement, success and happiness lie in being fully and positively human –

through our caring our creativity and our criticality ā€“

developed via service to the communities to which we belong.

-0-

All postings to this site relate to the central model in the

PhD. Summaries are HERE

Reflections inspired by Eckhart Tolle: 1

Could we experience stillness, oneness and Self without brain, mind and concepts!
Could we experience stillness, oneness and Self without brain, mind and concepts!

Perhaps arguing with Mr Tolle might be more accurate, great teacher though he is!

When you lose touch with inner stillness, you lose touch with yourself.Ā  When you lose touch with yourself, you lose yourself in the world.

Your innermost sense of self, of who you are, is inseparable from stillness.Ā  This is the I AM that is deeper than name and form. Stillness Speaks p.3

IMHO

1) It makes sense to distinguish between self and Self.

Self is Source/Wholenesss/Ultimate Reality/God etc, but unless you admit the usefulness of self as well no communication or pleasure or learning or anything is possible.Ā  So its not yourself its your (true) Self – that gives meaning, purpose and en-formed identity.Ā  If there is only Self talking to Self ad infinitum it is just God having perpetual inner dialogue.

2) The World is anything, at any moment, that stops us being in touch with Self.

4) I am as well as I AM – and that was God’s will.Ā  The duality is the key dynamic in His ‘Great Big Teaching Machine’ – i.e. embodied reality – in this world – with others.Ā  The ultimate extended metaphor of physical reality is another way to refer to His ‘Great Big Teaching Machine’.

5) ‘Name’ and ‘form’ is the means by which we come to discover namelessness and formlessness.

Perls of wisdom in Gestalt therapy

The only form of dream analysis that seemed to me to offer the dreamer real insight – as opposed to hocus-pocus interpretation – is that found in Gestalt Therapy, as developed by Fritz and Laura Perls.

In this form the dreamer identifies all of the elements in the dream, one by one, and re-tells the story of the dream to her/his self, (and to the therapist if there’s one present). The point being that all of the elelments in the story are aspects of the self and/or concerns and conflicts within the individual and her/his life. – all meaning all, every thing that is re-called even such things as wall-paper, or carpets!

This multiple re-tellings of the story include every element identified – including inanimate objects and animals. The idea is that in these re-tellings, with the empathic entering into each of the elements, a breakthrough of insight will come to the dream-teller. Often it does.

I learned about this form of dream ‘analysis’ when doing a counseling course. For the person doing the analyzing it is to seek integration through insight – without interpretation, especially on the part of others. We used a little book The Red Book of Gestalt (1982) by Gaie Houston which I’m astonished to see is stilled stocked by Amazon. The relevant chapter is chapter 6.

Below is the beginning of an introductory article about the Perls and Gestalt;

Overview

Gestalt therapy is a phenomenological-existential therapy founded by Frederick (Fritz) and Laura Perls in the 1940s. It teaches therapists and patients the phenomenological method of awareness, in which perceiving, feeling, and acting are distinguished from interpreting and reshuffling preexisting attitudes. Explanations and interpretations are considered less reliable than what is directly perceived and felt. Patients and therapists in Gestalt therapy dialogue, that is, communicate their phenomenological perspectives. Differences in perspectives become the focus of experimentation and continued dialogue. The goal is for clients to become aware of what they are doing, how they are doing it, and how they can change themselves, and at the same time, to learn to accept and value themselves.

Gestalt therapy focuses more on process (what is happening) than content (what is being discussed). The emphasis is on what is being done, thought and felt at the moment rather than on what was, might be, could be, or should be.

Basic Concepts

The Phenomenological Perspective

Phenomenology is a discipline that helps people stand aside from their usual way of thinking so that they can tell the difference between what is actually being perceived and felt in the current situation and what is residue from the past (Idhe, 1977). A Gestalt exploration respects, uses and clarifies immediate, “naive” perception “undebauched by learning” (Wertheimer, 1945, p. 331). Gestalt therapy treats what is “subjectively” felt in the present, as well as what is “objectively” observed, as real and important data. This contrasts with approaches that treat what the patient experiences as “mere appearances” and uses interpretation to find “real meaning.”

The goal of Gestalt phenomenological exploration is awareness, or insight. “Insight is a patterning of the perceptual field in such a way that the significant realities are apparent; it is the formation of a gestalt in which the relevant factors fall into place with respect to the whole” (Heidbreder, 1933, p. 355). In Gestalt therapy insight is clear understanding of the structure of the situation being studied.

Awareness without systematic exploration is not ordinarily sufficient to develop insight. Therefore, Gestalt therapy uses focused awareness and experimentation to achieve insight. How one becomes aware is crucial to any phenomenological investigation. The phenomenologist studies not only personal awareness but also the awareness process itself. The patient is to learn how to become aware of awareness. How the therapist and the patient experience their relationship is of special concern in Gestalt therapy (Yontef, 1976, 1982, 1983).

The Field Theory Perspective

The scientific world view that underlies the Gestalt phenomenological perspective is field theory. Field theory is a method of exploring that describes the whole field of which the event is currently a part rather than analyzing the event in terms of a class to which it belongs by its “nature” (e.g., Aristotelian classification) or a unilinear, historical, cause-effect sequence (e.g., Newtonian mechanics).

The field is a whole in which the parts are in immediate relationship and responsive to each other and no part is uninfluenced by what goes on elsewhere in the field. The field replaces the notion of discrete, isolated particles. The person in his or her life space constitutes a field.

In field theory no action is at a distance; that is, what has effect must touch that which is affected in time and space. Gestalt therapists work in the here and now and are sensitive to how the here and now includes residues of the past, such as body posture, habits, and beliefs.

The phenomenological field is defined by the observer and is meaningful only when one knows the frame of reference of the observer. The observer is necessary because what one sees is somewhat a function of how and when one looks.

Field approaches are descriptive rather than speculative, interpretive, or classificatory. The emphasis is on observing, describing, and explicating the exact structure of whatever is being studied. In Gestalt therapy, data unavailable to direct observation by the therapist are studied by phenomenological focusing, experimenting, reporting of participants, and dialogue (Yontef, 1982, 1983).

The Existential Perspective

Existentialism is based on the phenomenological method. Existential phenomenologists focus on people’s existence, relations with each other, joys and suffering, etc., as directly experienced.

Most people operate in an unstated context of conventional thought that obscures or avoids acknowledging how the world is. This is especially true of one’s relations in the world and one’s choices. Self-deception is the basis of inauthenticity: living that is not based on the truth of oneself in the world leads to feelings of dread, guilt and anxiety. Gestalt therapy provides a way of being authentic and meaningfully responsible for oneself. By becoming aware, one becomes able to choose and/or organize one’s own existence in a meaningful manner (Jacobs, 1978; Yontef, 1982, 1983).

The existential view holds that people are endlessly remaking or discovering themselves. There is no essence of human nature to be discovered “once and for all.” There are always new horizons, new problems and new opportunities.

Dialogue

The relationship between the therapist and the client is the most important aspect of psychotherapy. Existential dialogue is an essential part of Gestalt therapy’s methodology and is a manifestation of the existential perspective on relationship.

Relationship grows out of contact. Through contact people grow and form identities. Contact is the experience of boundary between “me” and “not-me.” It is the experience of interacting with the not-me while maintaining a self-identity separate from the not-me. Martin Buber states that the person (“I”) has meaning only in relation to others, in the I-Thou dialogue or in I-It manipulative contact. Gestalt therapists prefer experiencing the patient in dialogue to using therapeutic manipulation (I-It).

Gestalt therapy helps clients develop their own support for desired contact or withdrawal (L. Perls, 1976, 1978). Support refers to anything that makes contact or withdrawal possible: energy, body support, breathing, information, concern for others, language, and so forth. Support mobilizes resources for contact or withdrawal. For example, to support the excitement accompanying contact, a person must take in enough oxygen.

The Gestalt therapist works by engaging in dialogue rather than by manipulating the patient toward some therapeutic goal. Such contact is marked by straightforward caring, warmth, acceptance and self-responsibility. When therapists move patients toward some goal, the patients cannot be in charge of their own growth and self-support. Dialogue is based on experiencing the other person as he or she really is and showing the true self, sharing phenomenological awareness. The Gestalt therapist says what he or she means and encourages the patient to do the same. Gestalt dialogue embodies authenticity and responsibility.

The therapeutic relationship in Gestalt therapy emphasizes four characteristics of dialogue:

1. Inclusion. This is putting oneself as fully as possible into the experience of the other without judging, analyzing or interpreting while simultaneously retaining a sense of one’s separate, autonomous presence. This is an existential and interpersonal application of the phenomenological trust in immediate experience. Inclusion provides an environment of safety for the patient’s phenomenological work and, by communicating an understanding of the patient’s experience, helps sharpen the patient’s self-awareness.

2. Presence. The Gestalt therapist expresses herself to the patient. Regularly, judiciously, and with discrimination she expresses observations, preferences, feelings, personal experience and thoughts. Thus, the therapist shares her perspective by modeling phenomenological reporting, which aids the patient’s learning about trust and use of immediate experience to raise awareness. If the therapist relies on theory-derived interpretation, rather than personal presence, she leads the patient into relying on phenomena not in his own immediate experience as the tool for raising awareness. In Gestalt therapy the therapist does not use presence to manipulate the patient to conform to pre-established goals, but rather encourages patients to regulate themselves autonomously.

3. Commitment to dialogue. Contact is more than something two people do to each other. Contact is something that happens between people, something that arises from the interaction between them. The Gestalt therapist surrenders herself to this interpersonal process. This is allowing contact to happen rather than manipulating, making contact, and controlling the outcome.

4. Dialogue is lived. Dialogue is something done rather than talked about. “Lived” emphasizes the excitement and immediacy of doing. The mode of dialogue can be dancing, song, words, or any modality that expresses and moves the energy between or among the participants. An important contribution of Gestalt therapy to phenomenological experimentation is enlarging the parameters to include explication of experience by nonverbal expressions. However, the interaction is limited by ethics, appropriateness, therapeutic task, and so on.

To read the full article, and a whole bunch of other articles go HERE

—–0—–

All postings to this site relate to the central model in the

PhD. Summaries are HERE

SEE also Learning Motivation for Success